Showing posts with label National Wildlife magazine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Wildlife magazine. Show all posts

Thursday, July 17, 2014

Chandler Robbins, Father of Ornithology, Still Saving Birds

Red-tailed hawk on its first flight from its nest, symbol of the resurgence of some bird species, especially bald eagles, due to the banning of DDT in 1972.  Chan Robbins' research showed the danger of the pesticide to birds.  (Photo by Don Comis) 


I was thrilled to find Chandler "Chan" Robbins in the August/September 2014 issue of National Wildlife magazine today.

Robbins, "Father of Modern Ornithology", has helped make birdwatching a popular activity. He was the senior author of "The Field Guide to Birds of North America" and was an author of the Golden Guide to Birds of North America.  In 1945, he began work  as a wildlife biologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at Laurel, Maryland.  A website (http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/whatsnew/events/robbins/) devoted to him at his "retirement" in 2005 says that, "In the late 1940s, Chandler’s studies pointed out the deadly effects of DDT on bird populations and led to the 1972 U.S. ban on DDT as a pesticide."

The National Wildlife story describes how Robbins, in 1966, started the North American Breeding Bird Survey to monitor bird populations.  He first tested the techniques on the approximately 25,000 acres the Fish and Wildlife Service and many other agencies--federal and local--share with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Agricultural Research Service in Beltsville, Maryland.

The article also mentions his research on forest fragmentation , the idea that development can make islands of forests too small to support certain bird species.

When I worked as a science writer for the USDA in Beltsville, I interviewed Robbins twice for a story on wildlife on those 25,000 acres, a couple of years before his official retirment.

The first interview didn't go so well, partly because I was just beginning my birdwatching hobby.  But the second interview was astounding.  Robbins was nearing retirement then and I think forgot our appointment the day he got back from vacation.

As a result, he was in a more contemplative mood, and all I had to do was listen and take notes as he reminisced about his long career.  He held the same job and lived in the same house nearby all these years.  I found out from the magazine article that, although retired, he still goes to his office at times.

As he talked he sadly said he couldn't believe a certain warbler had disappeared in his lifetime.  He's seen the changes in bird populations both from his work and from his bird feeders and observations at home.

Just for the heck of it, I asked him how many birds migrated over the federal lands' where we worked and he had a fairly exact number.  He got that by staying up with his wife all night and counting silhouettes flying across a full moon.  He watched through a telescope through a grid for counting.

Unfortunately, the powers that be decided to cut two-thirds of my article, including all of the Robbins stuff, because it didn't fit the magazine's emphasis on research, especially present-day research, they felt.  But Robbins and other scientists had cleared the entire article for accuracy.

The remnant article can be seen at:  http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/AR/archive/oct03/farm1003.pdf.  It at least gives a hint of the value of this land mass and its historical contributions to the conservation movement.

When I find the full article I'll make it avaialble on this site and on my website at www.doncomis.simplesite.com.  And I'll highlight the Robbins section which I think is precious because it contains Robbins' thoughts, as well as a mention of other scientists in the Beltsville-Laurel area who developed the island fragmentation concept with experiments on the 25,000 acre "Green Wedge" in the Baltimore-Washington, D.C. corridor.

The more I think about it, Robbins is also the Father of Modern Citizen Science.  Not only does he rely on volunteers for the Breeding Bird Survey, but he and his father go way back as participants in the Audubon Christmas Bird Count.

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Bumblebee Watch




I like citizen science programs so much that I just signed up for "Bumblee Watch" (http://www.bumblebeewatch.org) after reading about it in the April/May 2014 issue of "National Wildlife" magazine.

I like projects like this in which I can send in photos of bugs "in the wild", without capturing or harming them, and get them identified by experts.  It gives me the kind of positive feedback I need to go on with a task like that and not give up.  Plus I help researchers conserve species.

I've been doing that with Butterflies and Moths of North America (BAMONA) at (http://www.butterfliesandmoths.org) for about a year.  In that time, with no knowledge or interest in moths, I was able to bring the total number of moths identified on that site for Knox County, Ohio, from 13 to more than 30.  And I have only been in this county for just under 2 years!

When you send photos, you can say, "I think this is a moth." or "I think this is a butterfly." or "I don't even know if it's a moth or a butterfly."  And you can go farther, if you can, and suggest which moth or butterfly it is.  With the help of a simple guide such as the Ohio Department of Natural Resources booklet on common butterflies of Ohio, you can quickly learn to identify a good 20 or more common butterflies.   Moths are harder, but you can suggest id's when you photograph a moth that looks like one you sent in and got identified by an expert.


"Bumblebee Watch" is intended to help save bumblebees.  The "National Widlife" article refers to a new analysis finding that "almost a third of North American bumblee species are declining, and some are threatened with extinction".   The article states that "four once-common...species have vanished from large portions of their former ranges.  A fifth may already be extinct.  Scientists are seeing similar losses in Europe, South America and Asia".

This can be a real loss to pollination, already threatened by the decline in European honeybee colonies.  Pollination by native bees is an important backup to honeybees.  They are more efficient pollinators than honeybees as well.

For information on other citizen science projects, please go to the "Citizen Science" button on the menu of my website at http://www.doncomis.simplesite.com.